Scott McMillan Suspect in Molestation

Scott McMillan – McMillan Law Firmof La Mesa, and who operates the McMillan Academy of Lawout of his office without a single graduate passing the bar, can now add alleged sex offenses committed against his daughter. An alarming new report, a public record, was discovered describing sex acts with his daughter. The report states in part, 

MCMILLAN stated he would invite his niece, daughter of SCOTT ANTHONY MCMILLAN, over to perform “sexual favors” for money since “she will end up being a whore anyways and why not train her now” as she “was a perfect age for grooming.” MCMILLAN also indicated he and his sons (all three attorneys) would perform legal work for BOURKE as trade for sexual favors with his minor daughter.

This is very concerning due to the prior post that Kenneth Bourke is a documented longtime friend of the McMillan family as seen in my former post, http://scott-mcmillan-law.blogspot.com/2014/09/scott-mcmillan-molest-la-mesa.html

 

Scott McMillan falsely states he is one of San Diego’s “Leading Law Firms” however is not ranked by any legal industry publication, or even a local news paper. One of the specialties of the McMillan Law Firm are appeals, however, the law firm lost virtually every appeal – see http://scott-mcmillan-law.blogspot.com/2011/06/wwwmcmillanlawus-scott-mcmillan-law.htmlA few more recent losses include: 

LOSS + McMillan Client to pay costs in Bridgeman v. Allen et al. Case No. D062183 08/30/2014: Opinion filed. (Signed Published) The judgment is affirmed. Objector and Respondent is entitled to her costs on appeal.

HUGE LOSS: Sterling v. Tri-City Healthcare District, D059810, 05/31/2013, “In her cross-appeal, Sterling contends the court erred in denying her attorney fees motion because her successful defense of the petitions vindicated an important right affecting the public interest and conferred a substantial benefit on the general public.  We determine the court properly applied applicable law and did not abuse its discretion in rejecting these arguments.” Very heavily litigated case with the hopes of attorney’s fees. McMillan filed six different appeals in this case. However, despite such efforts, no victory, no money.

LOSS: Morton v. Spotts, Case Number D058640, 05/31/2013, “(Signed Unpublished) The judgment is affirmed.”

LOSS: Robbins v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Roadone West, Inc. Case Number D057434, 06/10/2010, “Order denying petition filed.”

LOSS: Bridgeman v. Allen, Case Number D057337, 11/30/2010, “Dismissal order filed.”

Further, the Court of Appeal in San Diego found Scott McMillan basically lied to the court and sought to run up his attorney fees, http://scott-mcmillan-law.blogspot.com/2014/09/michelle-volk-scott-mcmillan.html