Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney Fraud

Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney, with The_McMillan_Law_Firm San Diego, 4670 Nebo Drive, was sued for fraud

The-McMillan-LawFirm "No Experience Necessary" La Mesa Attorney Scott McMillanney Fraud

Scott McMillan seeks out qualified applicants to represent his clients.

Showing posts with label lauren-brady-san-diego-attorney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lauren-brady-san-diego-attorney. Show all posts

Sunday, August 23, 2020

Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney Alert

It is important to know about San Diego attorney Scott McMillan since he has a long history of fraud allegations and losing major cases, even where he represents himself. I mean if he can't represent himself and loses, how can you have faith he can represent your interests? 

Another negative about hiring an attorney like Scott McMillan La Mesa attorney is that jurors often Google the attorney who is before them. On one hand you have an accomplished defense attorney who likely clerked for a judge, graduated from an ABA law school, then you have plaintiff's attorney > Scott McMillan San Diego attorney who appears to have lost every major case in the last several years, been laughed at by judges as noted below, has a criminal record as found on San Diego Superior Court index, a law school shut down for basically fraud, and public records alleging he took part in molestation - see it for yourself: 

scott mcmillan san diego attorney molest

A few of the major setbacks of Scott McMillan appear to include (please confirm with court records about the status of any of cases below as I would hate to get sued by Scott McMillan - albeit he naturally would lose, but still haha): 

2015: Lycurgan, Inc. v. Todd JonesFiled (ATF Chief), Ninth Cir., Case No. 15-55228, SDCA Case No. 3:14- cv-01424 [court found appeal filed by Scott McMillan to be without merit and dismissed case]

2016: Brightwell v. The McMillan Law Firm, Scott McMillan, Michelle Volk, Southern District of California Case 16-CV-1696 W (NLS) [Scott McMillan sued for fraud];

2016: Lycurgan, Inc. v. Todd Jones (ATF Chief) Case3:14-cv-01679-JLS-BGS ) [judges literally laughed at Scott McMillan’s argument and one judge called the case “just silly” see oral argument]

2018: McMillan v. Chaker SDCA Case No. 3:16-cv-02186 [Scott McMillan represented himself and lost federal lawsuit to remove child molestation report and other public records from internet – case dismissed see order];

2018: State Bar of California shuts down McMillan Academy of Law [after finding it never had a single graduate, law books out of date by years, and only three students enrolled in twelve years - see partial report below and full report here]

2019: Scott McMillan SanDiego attorney was sued yet again for FRAUD in De La Flor v. Scott McMillan San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2019-00038026-CU-FR-CTL [Scott McMillan sued for Fraud];

2019 Ochoa et al. v. Setton Pistachio of Terra Bella, Inc. et al. Case No. F073978 [Scott McMillan  lost wrongful death lawsuit after filing it in the wrong county, then lost the appeal];

2020: McMillan v. Chaker Ninth Circuit Case No.: 17-56676 [Scott McMillan San Diego attorney appeals when he lost lawsuit to remove public records and loses appeal too].




Saturday, April 18, 2020

San Diego Attorney Scott McMillan Lost Appeal

A report about San Diego attorney Scott McMillan , McMillan Law Firm, La Mesa, is contained in San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2017-0036344, and details how Scott McMillan’s involvement in sexual molestation of a child. The report has many detailed accounts and references to Scott McMillan very specifically.
Scott McMillan San Diego attorney filed a federal lawsuit under RICO to have numerous blogs posts removed from various websites. The judge dismissed the lawsuit finding it was frivolous. See civil RICO ruling. Scott McMillan filed an appeal in the Ninth Circuit  and his opening brief did not address issues such as the total absence of any indictable conduct where McMillan chiefly alleges defamation but that does not fall under the RICO law.Recently, Scott McMillan , lost an appeal and also lost his effort for a gag order to stop the publication of the child molestation report and publishing his dozens of losses in court. See images below.
Legal problems for San Diego attorney Scott McMillan continue to be revealed in public records. For example, fraud allegations were made by a well known law firm against Scott McMillan in federal court in Brightwell v. The McMillan Law Firm, Scott McMillan, Michelle Volk, Southern District of California Case 16-CV-1696 W (NLS).
The State Bar of California issued a serious blow to Scott McMillan who also runs a law school out of his small office near the railroad tracks in east San Diego. The 2017 State Bar Report clearly infers a law school with three students and no graduates is nothing more than a scam:
As a result, and as confirmed by the inspection, MAOL is noncompliant as to three material requirements: Its law library is noncompliant since its hardcopy legal authorities have not been updated since 2013; without any tuition income, the law school’s current and future financial viability appears questionable; and its website and written materials offer outdated and misleading information to both the general public and potential applicants.”
See entire State Bar Report about McMillan Academy of Law here.
Scott McMillan was also labeled a vexatious litigant in McMillan v. Weathersby (9th Cir. 2002) 31 F.App’x 371, 374, a label the appellate court did not find was abusive. Also, in 2017 Scott McMillan was found to have lied to a court and failed to file an opposition to the allegation. See Scott McMillan motion for sanctions.

Update: McMillan v. Chaker (9th Cir. 2020) 791 F.App'x 666, is a case where Scott McMillan sued Darren Chaker. San Diego attorney Scott McMillan sued Darren Chaker and demanded in part the court order him to remove online content that published a report about Scott McMillan being named in a report about child molestation see report as filed in court anti-SLAPP motion. On January 27, 2020, the Ninth Circuit appeals court rejected every argument of Scott McMillan and affirmed the dismissal of the lawsuit brought by Scott McMillan. Darren Chaker’s appellate attorney is former Los Angeles federal judge Stephen Larson.

Monday, December 24, 2018

Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney Failure Rate


Scott McMillan San Diego attorney, who also operates the McMillan Academy of Law out of his small office in east San Diego by railroad tracks. Scott McMillan has had a rough 2018, but it’s been a rough time for Scott McMillan in his multiple failing careers. In Scott McMillan v. Rudy Camacho  43 F.3d 1479 (9th Cir. 1994) the court REJECTED all of three arguments:

“McMillan contends the district court erred by concluding that he failed to show the possibility of irreparable harm. We reject the argument.” The court continued to state, “In his underlying action, McMillan alleged that the Customs Service is attempting to prevent him from practicing his new career as a customhouse broker by unreasonably seizing his property.”


However, the court rejected the argument of San Diego attorney Scott McMillan:
“Here, because McMillan has failed even to allege any hindrance which would prevent either his family members or his employers from protecting their own interests, the district court properly concluded that McMillan lacked standing to seek a preliminary injunction on their behalf….We deny McMillan's motion to strike the Government's supplemental excerpts of record. We also deny Appellee's "Motion to Dismiss due to Mootness."

There is little question Scott McMillan is a San Diegoattorney who has filed in excess of 115 appeals and writs and lost virtually all of them. It is a horrific track record for an attorney I believe who claims to be an appellate “expert” while the only thing Scott McMillan La Mesa seems to have is an expertise of bringing shame and embarrassment to his clients I presume.



Many attorneys who claim to be an appellate specialist have very high success rates. For example, one California law firm boasts that, “Overall, our lawyers have won reversals nearly three times as often as the average appellant. When defending judgments, we’ve prevailed eighty percent of the time.” See law firm statistics here.



















































Other attorneys who claim to be experts in California appeals have gained recognition by neutral third parties as being some of the best. For example, another law firm who considers itself as an appellate specialist,

“GMSR is ranked among the best appellate law firms by organizations and publications including Reuters, Chambers and Partners USA, California Lawyer Magazine, and the Daily Journal.  Notable awards and honors include:

Chambers and Partners USA — Consecutively ranks GMSR Band 1 in California for Litigation: Appellate Law.

U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers© — Ranked GMSR as a Tier 1 law firm in the 2018 Edition of “Best Law Firms.”

California Lawyer Magazine — GMSR’s appellate attorneys have received the prestigious California Lawyer Attorney of the Year (CLAY) Award six times for major contributions to development of the law.

Reuters — Named GMSR partner Timothy Coates one of the “Top Petitioners” in the United States Supreme Court, based on his success in having review granted in that Court.

Daily Journal — Included GMSR in its list of the top boutique law firms in 2014.

National Law Journal — Included GMSR on its Appellate Hot List in 2013.

Best Lawyers in America — Consecutively ranks GMSR’s lawyers and named seven to its list for appellate law in 2019.

Super Lawyers — Selected eight of GMSR’s partners to the 2018 Southern California Super

Lawyers list and two GMSR associates to the Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars list in 2018.”

The above can be seen at https://www.gmsr.com/about/awards-and-recognition/
However, although San Diego attorney Scott McMillan claims to be a “leading” San Diego attorney with his office in La Mesa (an east San Diego community), the fact remains he has never been and never will gain for having the success rate real, accomplished attorneys have. At least I do not believe he will, but who knows.