Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney, with The_McMillan_Law_Firm San Diego, 4670 Nebo Drive, was sued for fraud, see the lawsuit at https://www.docdroid.net/MMujagR/scott-mcmillan-la-mesa-fraud.pdf Although the lawsuit against Michelle Volk San Diego Attorney, and Scott McMillan was challenged, the court did not dismiss it. In a puzzled haste, Scott McMillan filed a lawsuit against the victim of his fraud, only to be discarded by the court. Of course, please review the court file for the most up to date information in Brightwell v. The McMillan Law Firm, Scott McMillan, Michelle Volk, Southern District of California Case 16-CV-1696 W (NLS).
Wasting judicial resources is concerning for me since courts
have limited time to deal with meritorious cases. People who waste judicial
resources are known as a vexatious litigant. In yet another case involving
Scott McMillan, La Mesa, McMillan v. Weathersby (9th Cir. 2002) 31 F.App'x 371,
374, complained about one of his many losses. The Court discarded the argument
of Scott McMillan and found that, “None of the three main episodes that
McMillan offers supports granting a mistrial. McMillan first asserts that
defense counsel violated the court's in limine ruling barring reference to
McMillan as a "vexatious litigant" by referring to McMillan's other
lawsuits in his opening statement.” McMillan LOST that case.
When Scott McMillan sued the San Diego Sheriff over its
Facebook account, filed a request for preliminary injunctive relief but was
DENIED as moot. (Karras v. Gore (S.D.Cal. Jan. 5, 2015, No. 14CV2564 BEN (KSC))
Ultimately San Diego attorney Scott McMillan was able to obtain $20 for his
client. See San Diego Union-Tribune Article date 2/20/15, Sheriff’s Facebook
Suit Settles for $20
Scott McMillan an
attorney in San Diego, is also the dean of the McMillan Academy of Law in La
Mesa. The State of California recently filed reports noting in over a decade
not a single student graduated!
"We have had
one student take the First Year Law Students' Examination and that student
passed. This is the basis for the 100% pass rate thus far. As of yet, no
students have graduated from the Academy."
The State Bar of California reported,
"Since
opening, only three students have ever completed MAOL’s first-year curriculum
and were able to take the First Year Law Students’ Examination; two of the
students eventually passed the examination but each then left MAOL and
transferred to other law schools. Since MAOL has had no students nor has held
any classes in almost five years, its program of legal education has now been
dormant for more than four years. As a result, and as confirmed by the inspection,
MAOL is noncompliant as to three material requirements: Its law library is
noncompliant since its hardcopy legal authorities have not been updated since
2013; without any tuition income, the law school’s current and future financial
viability appears questionable; and its website and written materials offer
outdated and misleading information to both the general public and potential
applicants."
